by Thomas Lancaster -

Cyber-Pseudepigraphy A New Challenge for Higher Education Policy and Management

Here is an early paper which covers issues related to contract cheating, although here it is known as cyber-pseudepigraphy. The paper was originally published in the Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management in 2004.

Cyber-pseudepigraphy: A New Challenge for Higher Education Policy and Management

The paper focuses on five issues related to students using the Internet to have work written for them which they can then submit.

The first is that this type of fraud is common. This is backed up by the data on contract cheating, although no attempt to quantify it was made at this point.

The second is that this “poses a significant challenge to public confidence in institutions of higher education”. Again, that is the same problem posed by any type of academic integrity if left unchecked.

Third, the paper notes the possible unfairness to students if their peers get away with cheating. This is one of the issues that I have always raised, where those students who do legitimately do their own work shouldn’t be penalised compared to others.

Fourth, the paper defines this as a problem of character. I take this as meaning that the students see no advantage in the learning process or reason to develop skills for themselves. That’s a valid criticism of many types of education and is again something that needs to be integral to every course so that students see the value of their studies.

Finally, the paper recommends that universities take urgent action. A suggestion is made for universities to revert back to examinations to ensure academic integrity.

The paper presents an interesting read when looking at contract cheating from the policy angle and indeed many of the same issues are still valid today. In particular, getting every student to feel so engaged with their course that they have no reason to wish to cheat has to be one of the main targets of higher education.

A copy of the original e-print version of the paper is available.

More information about the final version is available on the publisher website.

by Thomas Lancaster -

Is Finding The Answer To An Assignment Online Cheating?

The question about whether finding the answer to an assignment online is cheating has come up on the forums for the Chronicle Of Higher Education.

The answers given clearly believe that this is a form of cheating, although there are some interesting observations put forward, including relating this problem to contract cheating.

One student suggests that they did just this, because they needed help with a problem, but acknowledged this to their instructor and received full marks.

Of more concern is that assignments are still being set where the answer can be easily found online. This is encouraging students to cheat.

Where a standard assignment is used, it makes it very difficult to monitor any contract cheating, as the same assignment will likely be traceable back to many different institutions. Some elements of uniqueness are needed.

Whilst it is clear that academics often expect the best from their students, continued work on designing assessments that make both plagiarism and contract cheating difficult is necessary.

by Thomas Lancaster -

Students Paying Hundreds Of Pounds To Have Essays Written For Them – Telegraph

Here’s a version of the recent stories on contract cheating and essay writing provided by the Telegraph:

Although the story largely covers the same ground as the BBC story on contract cheating, there are some interesting comments included.

There are some good suggestions relating to educational materials to help with writing essays, although these rather miss the underlying problem.

There is also a suggestion of using exams more widely. There are certainly sectors of society and industry that would support this.

One comment mentions that only the top half of UK universities should be allowed to recruit international students. However, there is no evidence to suggest that contract cheating is any more or less prevelent at any particular type of universities. My own observations would suggest that the so-called “new universities” are actually much more on-the-ball at spotting contract cheating and designing assignments to reduce the likelihood of students outsourcing their work. If nothing else, students at these universities are much more likely to be taught by a lecturer than at other universities.

An alternative view to consider would be that only universities that can show that they are actively taking action against contract cheating could be considered suitable to take on international students.